 |
 |
U Texas Southwestern
State: Texas
Freida: 420-48-21-192
Positions: 13
Years: 4
| Average USMLE Step 1 Score of interviewed applicants: 149
Average USMLE Step 2 Score of interviewed applicants: 258
Percentage of applicants offered interviews who were AOA: 49%
|
Applied, Received Interview:
00090, Anonymous, Step 1: 254, Step 2: 249
00099, University of Kansas, Step 1: 262, Step 2: 269, AOA
00103, University of Colorado, Step 1: 248, Step 2: 251, AOA
00106, Anonymous, Step 1: 252, Step 2: 236, AOA
00107, University of South Alabama, Step 1: 249, Step 2: 246, AOA
00111, Anonymous, Step 1: 251, Step 2: 243
00123, Anonymous, Step 1: 219, Step 2: 251, AOA
00125, Anonymous, Step 1: 251
00129, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Step 1: 243, Step 2: 265, AOA
00135, University of Texas, Houston, Step 1: 255, AOA
00162, Loma Linda University, Step 1: 238, Step 2: 253, AOA
00170, University of Texas, Galveston, Step 1: 256, Step 2: 254, AOA
00184, Anonymous, Step 1: 252, Step 2: 241
00213, University of South Alabama, Step 1: 237, Step 2: 234, AOA
00243, Anonymous, Step 1: 257, Step 2: 240, AOA
00250, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Step 1: 232, Step 2: 253
00256, Anonymous, Step 1: 245, Step 2: 253
00257, University of Oklahoma, Step 1: 262, Step 2: 273, AOA
00258, University of Texas, Galveston, Step 1: 253, Step 2: 232, AOA
00259, University of Texas, Galveston, Step 1: 253, Step 2: 232, AOA
00318, Medical College of Georgia, Step 1: 255, Step 2: 263, AOA
00321, Baylor College, Step 1: 265, Step 2: 273, AOA
00324, University of Arkansas, Step 1: 239, Step 2: 245, AOA
00335, Anonymous, Step 1: 272, Step 2: 271, AOA
00338, University of Texas, Houston, Step 1: 263, AOA
00339, Anonymous, Step 1: 260
00346, Anonymous, Step 1: 261, Step 2: 258, AOA
00370, Anonymous, Step 1: 259, Step 2: 270, AOA
00373, Anonymous, Step 1: 239, Step 2: 249, AOA
00379, Baylor College, Step 1: 271, Step 2: 269, AOA
00397, Anonymous, Step 1: 245, AOA
00416, University of Washington, Step 1: 256, Step 2: 255, AOA
00466, University of Arizona, Step 1: 253, Step 2: 272, AOA
00478, Anonymous, Step 1: 244, Step 2: 246, AOA
00504, Anonymous, Step 1: 258, Step 2: 260, AOA
00505, Anonymous, Step 1: 240, Step 2: 244
00512, Anonymous, Step 1: 273, Step 2: 264, AOA
00522, Anonymous, Step 1: 252, Step 2: 254, AOA
00529, Anonymous, Step 1: 253, Step 2: 266
00547, University of Florida, Step 1: 262, Step 2: 266, AOA
00556, Anonymous, Step 1: 264, Step 2: 272, AOA
00563, Anonymous, Step 1: 258, Step 2: 269, AOA
00572, Anonymous, Step 1: 246, Step 2: 259, AOA
00574, Rosalind Franklin University, Step 1: 244, Step 2: 258, AOA
00578, University of Texas, Houston, Step 1: 247, Step 2: 261, AOA
00579, University of Texas, Southwestern, Step 1: 226, Step 2: 233
00582, Emory University, Step 1: 246, Step 2: 244
00586, Anonymous, Step 1: 245, AOA
00588, University of Texas, Houston, Step 1: 243, Step 2: 255, AOA
00590, University of Iowa, Step 1: 268, Step 2: 281, AOA
Applied, No Interview:
00076, Anonymous, Step 1: 228, Step 2: 253
00079, Nova Southeastern University, Step 1: 244
00096, Anonymous, Step 1: 225, Step 2: 254
00105, Anonymous, Step 1: 223, Step 2: 229
00110, Anonymous, Step 1: 225
00113, Anonymous, Step 1: 244, Step 2: 267
00122, Anonymous, Step 1: 231
00137, Tulane University, Step 1: 228, Step 2: 246
00173, Washington University in St. Louis, Step 1: 236, Step 2: 248
00192, Western University of Health Sciences, Step 1: 254
00197, George Washington University, Step 1: 246, Step 2: 240
00230, Baylor College, Step 1: 255
00236, Anonymous, Step 1: 251, Step 2: 255
00242, Anonymous, Step 1: 224, Step 2: 254
00252, , Step 1: 246, Step 2: 235
00316, Anonymous, Step 1: 265
00320, University of Arizona, Step 1: 223, Step 2: 228
00326, Anonymous, Step 1: 239
00328, Anonymous, Step 1: 230, Step 2: 231, AOA
00329, University of Oklahoma, Step 1: 242, Step 2: 257
00331, Morehouse School of Medicine, Step 1: 250, Step 2: 240
00332, University of Miami, Step 1: 255
00333, Anonymous, Step 1: 253
00336, University of California, Irvine, Step 1: 259
00337, University of Texas, Houston, Step 1: 251
00341, SUNY Buffalo, Step 1: 240
00344, Anonymous, Step 1: 230, Step 2: 231, AOA
00347, University of South Alabama, Step 1: 229, Step 2: 242
00366, Kansas City University, Step 1: 223
00377, University of Hawaii, Step 1: 250, Step 2: 239
00382, Washington University in St. Louis, Step 1: 261, Step 2: 255, AOA
00384, Texas Tech University, Step 1: 240
00387, University of North Texas, Step 1: 254
00418, University of Texas, San Antonio, Step 1: 236, Step 2: 246
00430, Washington University in St. Louis, Step 1: 266
00446, Anonymous, Step 1: 238, Step 2: 251, AOA
00453, University of Toledo, Step 1: 212, Step 2: 234
00457, Anonymous, Step 1: 230, Step 2: 242
00460, University of Kansas, Step 1: 239, Step 2: 241
00461, , Step 1: 246, Step 2: 260
00474, Anonymous, Step 1: 241, Step 2: 258
00489, Anonymous, Step 1: 244
00499, University of Oklahoma, Step 1: 242, Step 2: 257
00508, Anonymous, Step 1: 248, Step 2: 242
00531, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Step 1: 231, Step 2: 242
00532, Anonymous, Step 1: 243
00535, Anonymous, Step 1: 239
00552, Anonymous, Step 1: 242, Step 2: 267
00564, Anonymous, Step 1: 250, AOA
00565, University of Michigan, Step 1: 254, Step 2: 263
Interview Experiences
 Very good. Easy going. Friendly residents.
Great program! Excellent training and academic opportunities and would have been happy to have matched here.
really casual
I attended the 7 am conference prior to interview. It was very practical.
I attended the 7 am conference prior to interview. It was very practical.
This place is kind of old school. Some of the people who interviewed me were quite ancient. UTSW definitely felt like a conservative place. This isn't necessarily a bad thing just different from what I'm used to. Interviews are generally relaxed.
Friendly, laid back.
several interviews.
The best interview experience on the trail. Faculty were so friendly and residents were very chill. Loved this place.
Really laid back interview day.
Not as intimidating as I thought it would be. Mix of both older and younger faculty.
Very friendly laid back faculty and residents. Low stress interviews.
Great facilities. Nice interviews. One interviewer was kinda wierd but not to bad. Tour guides showed us where Kennedy died.
Dinner the night before
9:15AM-3:00PM
Four 20 minute interviews
Very laid back. Nice faculty and residents
Everyone was really, really nice. Conversational and friendly interview. Missed the dinner but heard it was awesome.
Best dinner.
Great!
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
Program Advantages
Awesome program. Fantastic pathology. Great attendings. Totally laid-back environment.
good teaching, good volume
Stable faculty. Well respected institution
Stable faculty. Well respected institution
Seemed to have a solid education, nice people.
strong, large program
Residents were all very cool. Great moonlighting
great program. would have been happy to have matched here.
Big name, nice people.
Great clinical experience here. The residents seemed to be reasonably happy. Research is quite strong but it is not emphasized. Faculty really enjoy teaching.
Flexible, resident-run program. High volume, great path at Parkland. Awesome moonlighting.
awesome facilities. several different places to train. good resident work hours.
Great moonlighting. Awesome hospital and they are building a new Parkland that is supposed to be amazing. Huge free-standing children's hospital. Dallas is one of the best cities in Texas (second to Austin). PD was great. Residents extremely happy.
Good reputation. Research if you want it.
Solid, large program with lots of exposure to pathology at Parkland.
Great reputation. Only place where you get a lot of OB ultrasound/MR training. Lots of moonlighting. Effectively like 6-7 weeks of vacation per year. $500/yr book fund + paid AFIP + $2000 stipend for AFIP. Cheap cost of living.
Nice volume. Great reputation. Dallas was an awesome city. Moonlighting was great especially neuro. Call schedule seemed pretty reasonable. Residents seemed really happy. I ranked this place #1.
Great Faculty, Nice residents
Great night float schedule with hidden vacation time. Radiology reading rooms were very nice. Good moonlighting. Very solid name. New Hospital coming in a couple of years. Would have been very happy to match here.
Larger program size (less call), outstanding research opportunities, new dept chair who has a vision, 2 new hospitals planned for the next 4-5 years, great moonlighting opportunities.
Really liked this program. Great night float system.
This program is awesome - great residents, great facilities, great faculty. Extremely nice and enthusiastic.
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
Program Disadvantages
Call can be difficult although not that frequent.
county hospital
Residents spread over many hospitals, high call volume.
Residents spread over many hospitals, high call volume.
equipment issues, but they are getting a new pacs system in place
The Dallas I saw while there was less than pleasant.
Call can be rough. Other services sound malignant. Not sure if this influences the radiology residents. Dallas is not for everyone.
No dedicated research time (although I think you can block some out if interested in academics).
The county hospital, Parkland, is old but has great pathology and is being replaced in 2 years anyway.
New department chair taking over. Not sure how that could affect the residency.
Hospital is in a bad looking neighborhood. Otherwise no other negatives.
They seem to take mainly people from Texas and Louisiana which makes it rough as someone applying from out of the region.
New Chairman maybe a disadvantage although I liked the fact he is moving in a research-oriented direction.
Everything's bigger in Texas.
I am not particularly found of Dallas, but like I said the people were awesome. Really liked this program
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
|
|
|
