Colorado| U Colorado: |  | | - Applied
- Attended interview
- Interview Experience:
| Huge group on a Saturday with (optional) info session/tour with the chairman on Friday. The tour included everything not radiology related on the impressive campus. I didn't feel that it was particularly useful. |
- Program Advantages:
| Nice facilities; Denver is a cool town with great weather; Chairman is very involved in advocating more research and building the program. |
- Program Disadvantages:
| Program is in Aurora, which is about a 30 min drive through Denver's 'ghetto' from downtown; residents kept to themselves during dinner and didn't seem very interested in telling candidates about the program; Denver is not very cosmopolitan. |
|
Connecticut
Illinois| Advocate Illinois Masonic Med Ctr: | | | - Applied
| | Loyola U: | | | - Applied
| | McGaw Med Ctr of Northwestern U: | | | - Applied
| | Rush U Med Ctr: | | | - Applied
| | U Chicago: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
- Interview Experience:
| Pre-interview dinner was the best I've been to, with a fun group of residents who could not stop talking about how much they loved the program; Interview day started with presentation from PD, who is a nice guy with a good sense of humor; beautiful confer |
- Program Advantages:
| Collegial atmosphere; residents seem to get great training; highest physics scores for some reason; Chicago is a great city; U of C campus is beautiful and short commute from downtown; relaxed call schedule; some moonlighting available. |
- Program Disadvantages:
| Not a level-one trauma center; call may be too chill. |
| | U Illinois COM at Chicago: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
- Interview Experience:
| Pre-interview dinner wasn't the best - sit at a long table and talk to a resident if you're lucky to be near one; hospital isn't the nicest; interview day was speed-dating style - 6 interviews; all interviewers were nice, although one was substituted in a |
- Program Advantages:
|
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan| Henry Ford Hosp: | | | - Rotated at this institution
- Applied
- Attended interview
| | Oakwood Hosp: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
- Interview Experience:
| Very relaxed interview day. Two interviews - one with PD and the other with the Chair. PD was very nice and gregarious. He seems to be a great advocate for his program. Chair was on the older side and mentioned retiring soon. |
- Program Advantages:
| Very easygoing residents who seem to be happy. 24/7 attending coverage (except during IR). Great support staff. No fellows, so plenty of procedures available. |
- Program Disadvantages:
| Small (taking only 4 residents this year); IR seems to be very busy. |
| | U Michigan: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
| | Wayne St U/Detroit Med Ctr: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
|
| | Michigan
Minnesota
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania| Albert Einsteincare Network: | | | - Applied
| | Drexel U COM/Hahnemann U Hosp: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
- Interview Experience:
| Four interviews: Chief resident, PD, Chair and member of selection committee. PD was very nice and easygoing; good sense of humor. Interview with the chair was great, although he is a bit eccentric. |
- Program Advantages:
| Good location in Philly; no fellows, so residents get a lot of experience; free parking. |
- Program Disadvantages:
| Felt like they hid the residents from us; possibility of them being overworked; no attendings on call; didn't seem like it was anyone's 'first choice' program. |
| | Pennsylvania Hosp of the U Pennsylvania: | | | - Applied
- Attended interview
| | Temple U Hosp: | | | - Applied
| | Thomas Jefferson U: | | | - Applied
|
|
